Trial Publicity: Under Rule 3.6, which topic may a lawyer publicly state about a case?

Trial Publicity: Under Rule 3.6, which topic may a lawyer publicly state about a case?

• A. Scheduling or result of any step in litigation.
• B. The confidential strategy of the defense.
• C. The private communications with the client.
• D. The personal evaluation of the jury pool.

Answer: (A)

Rule 3.6 allows a lawyer to publicly discuss straightforward, non-substantive updates about the case’s progression. Specifically, you may state the scheduling of hearings or events and the results of any step in the litigation because these are factual, procedural details that do not reveal trial strategy or confidential communications. They help inform the public without prejudicing the proceedings, as long as the statements stay within that procedural scope. Statements about confidential defense strategy would reveal tactics and are not permitted. Private attorney-client communications are protected and cannot be disclosed. A personal evaluation of the jury pool could prejudice the case by signaling bias or influencing potential jurors, which is also not allowed.

Rule 3.6 allows a lawyer to publicly discuss straightforward, non-substantive updates about the case’s progression. Specifically, you may state the scheduling of hearings or events and the results of any step in the litigation because these are factual, procedural details that do not reveal trial strategy or confidential communications. They help inform the public without prejudicing the proceedings, as long as the statements stay within that procedural scope.

Statements about confidential defense strategy would reveal tactics and are not permitted. Private attorney-client communications are protected and cannot be disclosed. A personal evaluation of the jury pool could prejudice the case by signaling bias or influencing potential jurors, which is also not allowed.